Tuesday, July 8, 2014

2013 (21) November (1) October (1) September (1) May (1) April (5) March (6) Februa


UN climate panel has been outstanding, and it is therefore necessary that science remains open, transparent and impeccable. Therefore, for more reforms of the panel. Several cass cafe researchers are using the trade journal cass cafe Nature and the Guardian cass cafe started to make suggestions on how the future can avoid the deficiencies in the IPCC reports, which have recently come to light. Generally, most of the proposals in the direction of greater cass cafe independence from politics and focus more on scientific merit. But how IPCC be structured to support this? Must have a permanent staff of paid researchers? Should it be divided into several units? Or should it be shut down and replaced by something else? Jeff Price WWF believes that the IPCC reports must be supplemented with a set of additional reports to be come more often, be more current and only go through one round academic peer review cass cafe (the large, 6-year reports are also through a ekspert-/nationalstatsreview before they are published). He also believes that the lead authors of the chapters should be better selected based on their expertise, without regard to their gender, geographical cass cafe origin or views (right now selected the lead authors of governments). The German climate scientist Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, an adviser to Angela Merkel, also believes that there must be a clear separation between science and politics. He agrees that the IPCC authors and representatives should be chosen by nation states, but the leading scientific academies. One of the leading IPCC authors, Mike Hulme of the University of East Anglia, believes that the IPCC should be divided into three separate units after the next report, which is expected to come in 2014. One section will exclusively deal with the science, the other with regional aspects as well as social, cultural and economic cass cafe implications of climate change, and the third formulate specific policy proposals and be represented by strong personalities across the global spectrum. Eduardo Zorita from the research center in Geesthacht in Germany mean that you have to establish a fully independent institution in building similar to the International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA. Its reports should be subjected to rigorous peer review. Any gaps in the research material and divergent views should be supplemented by external reviews. John R. Christy of the University of Alabama in Huntsville, USA, believes that the IPCC has become an 'echo chamber' of mainstream scientists that suppress opposing views. He calls for a far more transparent and representative selection of authors and advocates a wiki-like structure in which a group of 4-8 experts selected by the scientific academies, three-year cass cafe internships brings together the many peer-reviewed contributions to the synthesis reports. Controversies will be determined by the lead authors, but with transparent procedures and with links to all texts and rebuttals. Also Danish climate scientists have new ideas. Jens Hesselbjerg DMI suggested in last week's engineer to prepare a report with only Danish researchers. cass cafe This might give an overview of the degree of agreement or disagreement among the country's climate experts, and with its national focus may also lead to greater ownership of the public and the Danish politicians. Rigging or sloppiness? The last few months have been a difficult time for the IPCC and climate scientists. First came the news of the hacked emails from the University of East Anglia with accusations of data manipulation and attempts to keep skeptical cass cafe voices outside. So we had the disastrous cass cafe Copenhagen conference with a couple of intent to comfort us, and so began the story of the IPCC's erroneous claims about Himalayan glaciers. Other stories have emerged: Dubious claims that the warming creates more and more extreme weather events; problematic projections that the Amazon rainforest will be reduced by 40 percent; Wrong number for Holland's demise (it is 26 per cent. below sea level, not 55) and doubts about the IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri is a conflict of interest with his institute TERI or not.
Popular Posts
The largest study of Africans' genetic variation shows that we all come from the Namibian cass cafe desert in South Africa. Nog ...
2013 (21) November (1) October (1) September (1) May (1) April (5) March (6) February (4) January (2) 2012 (50) December (5) November (7) October (5) September cass cafe (5) August (3) June (2) May (1) April (4) March (6) February (7) January (5) 2011 (54) December cass cafe (1) November (5) October (6) September (5) August (5) July (2) June (4) May (4) April (4) March (6)

No comments:

Post a Comment