Monday, June 1, 2015

One of the news of yesterday will certainly msa raise a substantial cloud of dust. Prime Minister J

Do not blind, but arrogant right - newspaper
Home News Reviews to rate the company msa Spirituality Lifestyle Culture Ecology Education Brezmejci Highlights of the day we noticed the lens of nature and landscape Travelling rewrite art inspired truth and compassion
One of the news of yesterday will certainly msa raise a substantial cloud of dust. Prime Minister Janez Janša is the Minister of Justice msa of Pličaniću msa ordered a report on the case Vaskrsić. Recall, it is a notorious example, sales of family houses, which the court found to auction due to 124 euros of unpaid debts. Despite the fact that in the best case will not be described otherwise than shame for the Slovenian Justice, the Prime Minister runs the risk that it will be the media, the opposition and, of course, representatives of the judiciary accused of interference in the independence of the judiciary.
When the case came Vaskrsić in public, msa of course, many of us thought msa that it was an unfortunate situation, perhaps a misunderstanding. In order to sell the house to someone because of debt, which is only a thousandth of its value? Sounds like Sharia law somewhere in the Afghan mountains. A real shock was only followed. A few days after the outbreak msa of the scandal, the public is heard from the President of the Court of Ljubljana Anton Panjan, who said that the lithium judge had acted entirely properly.
Let's see the developments that led to the sale of the house. It is obvious that the owner of the house for some time ignored the requirement to pay the debt all together took some good year. When the fateful day learned that the house is sold, it is immediately settle the debt and the plaintiff company msa Waterworks and Sewage, immediately stop the recovery. Lithium court issued a decision suspending the execution, msa but did not stop the sale of the house. msa In other words, repayment of debt from the owner of the house no longer require a house to him in spite of everything sold. Hardly anyone believed that this what trace of Conduct.
And that's not all - have bizarnejša is a story about the fact that the creditor who originally really demanded repayment by the sale of the debtor's property, after the first auction, the court urged to recover the debt by seizing the debtor's wages. A judge, rather than to stop the enforcement of property and first decided on the seizure of wages, both procedures in parallel rode forward and first completed property enforcement. The President of the Court, of course, claims that it had to do so. And if you believe the STA, the judge approved the auction also call the creditor to the seizure of salary. Even this president Panjan argues that it is only right. Namely, the debtor punished twice for one sin.
Having described the man, of course, he gets the feeling that Slovenian Justice lives in another planetukot the people on whose behalf the judgment. The President of the Court in fact refers to the procedural rules, pronounced even on the creditor as a "master" msa of the process, however, completely oblivious to common sense and sense of justice. msa Common sense tells us that weeds are not controlled by the napalm, sense of justice, however, that due to the small sin of the debtor and his family can not get at existence. But it seems that no lithium judge, not the President of the Ljubljana court does not have neither a sense of justice, nor common sense. Given the fact that this topic has not responded to one of the top Slovenian justice, but it is feared that the same symptom in the Slovenian judiciary much more widespread. msa
One of the key achievements of the Nuremberg process is precedent to the exercise of command does not justify the implementation of evil works. In other words - regardless of the oath, and the hierarchy of legal norms in a society, everyone has the right and the duty to act fairly. But it seems that the Slovenian judiciary this lesson slept.
The man, of course, ask how far reaches the independence of the judiciary. Or, how far it should reach the influence of the executive. From the government they are in fact reported that "will be the basis of the reports and official information received or decisions to amend inappropriate or unfair regulations or seek review of individual contentious cases". The first is certainly not objectionable, but bržčas will not be enough. The change unfair rules without changing the posture of moral justice msa will not bring much. The revision of controversial cases that would likely be necessary, but will naturally msa result in a storm and complaints about government interference in the independence of the judiciary.
Related articles: From Slomška to Kramberger Although we live in a time when the economic crisis submerge many companies, the economic debacle of the Maribor Archdiocese something msa special. On the one hand, of course, for the record ... The grave is empty! The empty tomb, which narrate the four evangelists, and in which was placed the suffering and crucified Christ is the key message of the Christian Easter morning and ... more important than mathematics "Something new I do now spring up, did not you notice?" (Is 43 18-19, 21-22, 24b-25) These days, the media, international and local, to report on the trial of Anders Behringu ... Mother, pardon, stepmother Church In previous column

No comments:

Post a Comment