Safeguarding the facade of the Church of St. Vincent de Paul is perhaps not as acquired previously thought, after all. Contrary to what was announced Minister Christine St-Pierre in the spring, a spokesman johnson and wales charlotte for Jaro, who own the land Hotels, said Thursday the Sun in the sense that no agreement had been reached with the Department of Culture.
"Not at all. (...) We still have no agreement with the Culture, but one day it will happen, johnson and wales charlotte "said Nancy Robitaille, the Hôtels Jaro, in a telephone interview.
In 2006, the owner of Les Hôtels Jaro, Jacques Robitaille, started without the agreement of the Ministry of Culture (MCQ), the destruction of the Church of St. Vincent de Paul to build a new hotel . MCQ, which had been presented with a fait accompli, had then stop the work in time to save the facade, the last part of the building still standing. (...)
As this site will bring the minimum necessary income to Mr. Robitaille, it will not be a hurry to sell it or develop it. The parking lot behind the facade is still full of cars but I do not think people who use it realize they are funding this inertia. We need to encourage people to boycott johnson and wales charlotte everything Jaro - it's always johnson and wales charlotte about money and profits that moves promoters. johnson and wales charlotte Report this comment
I sometimes wonder if certain johnson and wales charlotte lands transform "high potential" of the City "hot potato" is not a good idea. Let me explain: firstly, the City identifies lands that creates a high potential for development (especially by their location). I guess the city is already ready for this kind of exercise in the development of its PDAD. Then all vacant land so identified is taxed at 15% rather than 2.7% currently (or in the vicinity, I do not have the exact figure).
On the one hand, it would send a clear message to entrepreneursp johnson and wales charlotte some land can not remain forever undeveloped. johnson and wales charlotte However, it probably would reject some as often, even after land acquisition, delays can be long enough to accept a project. Report this comment
Jeff
I think propriètaire.Ferme ground should johnson and wales charlotte build his famous hôtel.Mais first why not move the front of the church BTW, as on the Plains of abraham.Ca not hurt lasts just a facade johnson and wales charlotte of a church we say Debrit guerre.Ce field of high potential johnson and wales charlotte développement.En more beautiful views, tourists will adorer.Ou in other cases the owner could keep the facade and incorporate it in his new idea hôtel.Bonne n 'Is pas.Faut dekoi do with this urban vestige. Report this comment
It is true that the facade is poor; it was built there a very long time. By religion, St. Vincent de Paul was a poor man who gave much to others; Besides his charities remain. It would have been improper to put the package in a neighborhood after all where all people were starving. All the poor people of the neighborhood gathered there to help. The patro has done much for the people of the parish.
My grandmother, my mother are married. It was at that time a poor neighborhood where I grew up disadvantaged. This church was an architectural jewel inside; johnson and wales charlotte I will remember every detail.
I can easily imagine johnson and wales charlotte this dull facade but full of history fit into the unique architecture of a hotel front; and I hope it will happen. This would give a unique style, blending old-fashioned and modern;-) Report this comment
Personally I spend every morning in front of the church to work and I wonder when is he going to do with this dekoi batisse.Une johnson and wales charlotte hotel with the same facade would quartier.J'espère the property at that project'll finally be realized johnson and wales charlotte even if the developer has issues with the Minister of culture.Un project like this refavoriserais twerrais johnson and wales charlotte this because johnson and wales charlotte I admit that it looks like a vestige of the second world war. Report this comment
@ Sebastian: the tax rate is about double the built-up land, whether it is from this surcharge which you speak. johnson and wales charlotte This is what gives us about 2.7%. And as the field takes almost as valuable as this tax year, it does not cost the developer to wait ... Report this comment
Some cities are the
No comments:
Post a Comment